Username   Password       Forgot your password?  Forgot your username? 

 

Novel Bayesian Approach to Assess System Availability using a Threshold to Censor Data

Volume 15, Number 5, May 2019, pp. 1314-1325
DOI: 10.23940/ijpe.19.05.p7.13141325

Esi Saaria, Jing Lina, Bin Liub, Liangwei Zhanga,c, and Ramin Karima

aDivision of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 97897, Sweden
bDepartment of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, UK
cDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, 523808, China

(Submitted on February 22, 2019; Revised on April 20, 2019; Accepted on May 18, 2019)

Abstract:

Assessment of system availability has been studied from the design stage to the operational stage in various system configurations using either analytic or simulation techniques. However, the former cannot handle complicated state changes, and the latter is computationally expensive. This study proposes a Bayesian approach to evaluate system availability. In this approach: 1) Mean Time to Failure (MTTF) and Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) are treated as distributions instead of being "averaged" to better describe real scenarios and overcome the limitations of data sample size; 2) Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations are applied to take advantage of the analytical and simulation methods; and 3) a threshold is set up for Time to Failure (TTR) data and Time to Repair (TTR) data, and new datasets with right-censored data are created to reveal the connections between technical and "Soft" KPIs. To demonstrate the approach, the paper considers a case study of a balling drum system in a mining company. In this system, MTTF and MTTR are determined by a Bayesian Weibull model and a Bayesian lognormal model, respectively. The results show that the proposed approach can integrate the analytical and simulation methods to assess system availability and could be applied to other technical problems in asset management (e.g., other industries, other systems). By comparing the results with and without considering the threshold for censoring data, we show the threshold can be used as a monitoring line for continuous improvement in the investigated mining company.

 

References: 14

    1. D. Raje, R. Olaniya, P. Wakhare, and A. Deshpande, “Availability Assessment of a Two-unit Stand-by Pumping System,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 68, pp. 269-274, 2000 
    2. A. C. Marquez, A. S. Heguedas, and B. Iung, “Monte Carlo-based Assessment of System Availability. A Case Study for Cogeneration Plants,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 88, pp. 273-289, 2005 
    3. A. C. Marquez and B. Iung, “A Structured Approach for the Assessment of System Availability and Reliability using Monte Carlo Simulation,” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 125-136, 2007 
    4. S. F. Yasseri and H. Bahai, “Availability Assessment of Subsea Distribution Systems at the Architectural Level,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 153, pp. 399-411, 2018
    5. E. Zio, M. Marella, and L. podofillini, “A Monte Carlo Simulation Approach to the Availability Assessment of Multi-State System with Operational Dependencies,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 92, pp. 871-882, 2007
    6. R. Dekker and W. Groenendijk, “Availability Assessment Methods and their Application in Practice,” Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 35, No. 9-10, pp. 1257-1274, 1995
    7. A. B. Ocnasu, “Distribution System Availability Assessment-Monte Carlo and Antithetic Variates Method,” Vienna, 2007
    8. S. Faghih-Roohi, M. Xie, K. M. Ng, and R. C. Yam, “Dynamic Availability Assessment and Optimal Component Design of Multi-state Weighted k-out-of-n Systems,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 123, pp. 57-62, 2014
    9. D. M. Brender, “The Bayesian Assessment of System Availability: Advanced Applications and Techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 138-147, 1968
    10. D. M. Brender, “The Prediction and Measurement of System Availability: A Bayesian Treatment,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 127-138, 1968
    11. W. Kuo, “Bayesian Availability using Gamma Distributed Priors,” IIE Transactions, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 132-140, 1985
    12. K. Sharma and R. Bhutani, “Bayesian Analysis of System Availability,” Microelectronic Reliability, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 809-811, 1993
    13. M. A. Khan and H. Islam, “Bayesian Analysis of System Availability with Half-Normal Life Time,” Quality Technology and Quantitative Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 203-209, 2012
    14. J. Lin, “An Integrated Procedure for Bayesian Reliability Inference using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods,” Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering, Vol. 2014, pp. 1-16, 2014

     

    Please note : You will need Adobe Acrobat viewer to view the full articles.Get Free Adobe Reader

     
    This site uses encryption for transmitting your passwords. ratmilwebsolutions.com