Username   Password       Forgot your password?  Forgot your username? 

ISSUES BY YEAR

Volume 15 - 2019

No.1 January 2019
No.1 January 2019
No.2 February 2019
No.2 February 2019
No.3 March 2019
No.3 March 2019

Volume 14 - 2018

No.1 January 2018
No.1 January 2018
No.3 March 2018
No.3 March 2018
No.4 April 2018
No.4 April 2018
No.5 May 2018
No.5 May 2018
No.6 June 2018
No.6 June 2018
No.7 July 2018
No.7 July 2018
No.8 August 2018
No.8 August 2018
No.9 September 2018
No.9 September 2018
No.10 October 2018
No.10 October 2018
No.11 November 2018
No.11 November 2018
No.12 December 2018
No.12 December 2018

Volume 13 - 2017

No.4 July 2017
No.4 July 2017
No.5 September 2017
No.5 September 2017
No.7 November 2017
No.7 November 2017
No.8 December 2017
No.8 December 2017

Volume 12 - 2016

Volume 11 - 2015

Volume 10 - 2014

Volume 9 - 2013

Volume 8 - 2012

Volume 7 - 2011

Volume 6 - 2010

Volume 5 - 2009

Volume 4 - 2008

Volume 3 - 2007

Volume 2 - 2006

 

Fault Propagation Modelling for Fluid System Health Monitoring

Volume 7, Number 2, March 2011 - Paper 3 - pp. 137-154

R. REMENYTE-PRESCOTT and J. D. ANDREWS

Nottingham Transportation Engineering Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK

(Received on October 27, 2009, revised on August 04, 2010) 


Abstract:

Fault diagnostics systems are incorporated to determine the health of the system they monitor.  There are however times when the diagnostics system reports faults which do not exist.  This situation commonly arises at system start-up when high vibration levels exist and the systems are not performing in the same way as when they are operational.  Unnecessary shutdowns can occur due to transient behaviour of the system.  On autonomous vehicles, such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), information about the health of the system can be used to support the decision making process and to plan the future system operation.  When faults are reported on autonomous systems, where there is no pilot to interpret the conditions reported, a method is needed to establish whether the reported faults do exist.  Utilizing a fault propagation modeling technique deviations in system variables can be propagated through the system until further evidence of fault presence is observed.  If some evidence that contradicts the fault presence is found, the fault can be cancelled and unnecessary shutdowns can be avoided.


In this paper a propagation table method is developed to model fault propagation through a system.  The system is broken down into its constituent components and each model shows how process variables depend not only on the state of the component but also on the state of the entire system.  The outputs of the two-way fault propagation modeling are values of process variables at different locations in the system.  These values can be compared with the symptoms observed and used to cancel or confirm faults.  This comparison process is accomplished at each phase that the system goes through during its defined mission.  The illustration of the fault propagation methodology is given using an example system, and its application for the fault cancellation process is discussed.

 

References: 14

Click here to download the paper.

Please note : You will need Adobe Acrobat viewer to view the full articles.Get Free Adobe Reader

 

CURRENT ISSUE

Prev Next

Cascaded Trust Network-based Block-Incremental Recommendation Strategy

Shujuan Ji, Da Li, Qing Zhang, Chunjin Zhang, and Chunxiao Bao

Read more

Cuckoo-based Malware Dynamic Analysis

Lele Wang, Binqiang Wang, Jiangang Liu, Qiguang Miao, and Jianhui Zhang

Read more

Colorization for Anime Sketches with Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Network

Guanghua Zhang, Mengnan Qu, Yuhao Jin, and Qingpeng Song

Read more

Bayesian Network Model for Learning Arithmetic Concepts

Yali Lv, Tong Jing, Yuhua Qian, Jiye Liang, Jianai Wu, and Junzhong Miao

Read more

Collaboration System Design of the Transportation Platform

Zhongwen Wang, Dong Liang, Ruizhen Duan, and Mingshan Chi

Read more

Specific Emitter Identification based on Power Amplifier

Zhen Zhang, Jie Chang, Mengqiu Chai, and Nan Tang

Read more

NRSSD: Normalizing Received Signal Strength to Address Device Diversity Problem in Fingerprinting Po…

Chunxiu Li, Jianli Zhao, Qiuxia Sun, Xiang Gao, Guoqiang Sun, and Chendi Zhu

Read more

Fast AIS Data Decoding Algorithm for Multi-Core CPU

Xiangkun Zeng, Huaran Yan, Yingjie Xiao and Xiaoming Yang

Read more
This site uses encryption for transmitting your passwords. ratmilwebsolutions.com