Username   Password       Forgot your password?  Forgot your username? 

 

Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Machinery based on K-S Distance and LSTM Neural Network

Volume 15, Number 3, March 2019, pp. 895-901
DOI: 10.23940/ijpe.19.03.p18.895901

Yang Gea,b, Lanzhong Guoa,b, and Yan Doua,b

aKey Construction Laboratory on Elevator Intelligent Safety of Jiangsu Province, Changshu, 215500, China

bSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Changshu Institute of Technology, Changshu, 215500, China


(Submitted on October 23, 2018; Revised on November 25, 2018; Accepted on December 26, 2018)

Abstract:

The remaining useful life is key to the decision-making of machinery maintenance. The online prediction of remaining useful life has become a very urgent need for mechanical equipment with high reliability requirements. The aim of this paper is to provide a simple and effective method for predicting the remaining life of the machine under the condition of small sample. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test theory is used to extract the health state feature of the machine. Based on the Long and Short Term Memory (LSTM) theory, an online method of remaining useful life prediction is proposed. The bearing life vibration data verification shows that the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance is sensitive to the development and expansion of the defects. Furthermore, the proposed method of remaining useful life prediction based on LSTM theory has high prediction accuracy. The technician can then use this method to take appropriate maintenance operations.

 

References: 17

        1. R. Rocchetta, M. Broggi, Q. Huchet, and E. Patelli, “Online Bayesian Model Updating for Structural Health Monitoring,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 103, pp. 174-195, March 2018
        2. G. Walter and S. D. Flapper, “Condition-based Maintenance for Complex Systems based on Current Component Status and Bayesian Updating of Component Reliability,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 168, pp. 227-239, December 2017
        3. J. H. Shin and H. B. Jun, “On Condition based Maintenance Policy,” Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 119-127, January 2015
        4. M. S. Kan, A. C. C. Tan, and J. Mathew, “A Review on Prognostic Techniques for Non-Stationary and Non-Linear Rotating Systems,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 62-63, pp. 1-20, October 2015
        5. J. L. Zhang, D. G. Shang, Y. J. Sun, and X. W. Wang, “Multiaxial High-Cycle Fatigue Life Prediction Model based on the Critical Plane Approach Considering Mean Stress Effects,” International Journal of Damage Mechanics, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 32-46, January 2018
        6. J. Q. Hu, L. B. Zhang, L. Ma, and L. Wang, “An Integrated Safety Prognosis Model for Complex System based on Dynamic Bayesian Network and Ant Colony Algorithm,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 1431-1446, March 2011
        7. L. Yang and J. Lee, “Bayesian Belief Network-based Approach for Diagnostics and Prognostics of Semiconductor Manufacturing System,” Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 66-74, February 2012
        8. Z. Q. Zhao, B. Liang, X. Q. Wang, and W. N. Lu, “Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Aircraft Engine based on Degradation Pattern Learning,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 164, pp. 74-83, August 2017
        9. M. A. Djeziri, S. Benmoussa, and R. Sanchez, “Hybrid Method for Remaining Useful Life Prediction in Wind Turbine Systems,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 116, pp. 173-187, February2017
        10. J. Z. Sikorska, M. Hodkiewicz, and L. Ma, “Prognostic Modelling Options for Remaining Useful Life Estimation by Industry,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 1803-1836, July 2011
        11. X. S. Si, W. Wang, C. H. Hu, and D. H. Zhou, “Remaining Useful Life Estimation—A Review on the Statistical Data Driven Approaches,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 213, No. 1, pp. 1-14, August 2011
        12. L. X. Liao, “Discovering Prognostic Features using Genetic Programming in Remaining Useful Life Prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 2464-2472, May 2014
        13. J. B. Yu, “A Hybrid Feature Selection Scheme and Self-Organizing Map Model for Machine Health Assessment,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 4041-4054, July 2011
        14. F. Liu, Y. B. Liu, F. L. Chen, and B. He. “Residual Life Prediction for Ball Bearings based on Joint Approximate Diagonalization of Eigen Matrices and Extreme Learning Machine,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 231, No. 9, pp. 1699-1711, May 2015
        15. W. Caesarendra, A. Widodo, and B. Yang, “Combination of Probability Approach and Support Vector Machine Towards Machine Health Prognostics,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 165-173, April 2011
        16. C. Sun, Z. Zhang, and Z. He, “Research on Bearing Life Prediction based on Support Vector Machine and Its Application,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 305, No. 1, 2011
        17. S. J. Dong and T. H. Luo, “Bearing Degradation Process Prediction based on The PCA and Optimized LS-SVM Model,” Measurement, Vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 3143-3152, November 2013
        18. A. M. Fu, X. Z. Wang, Y. L. He, and L. S. Wang, “A Study on Residence Error of Training an Extreme Learning Machine and its Application to Evolutionary Algorithms,” Neurocomputing, Vol. 146, pp. 75-82, December 2014
        19. Y. N. Qian and R. Q. Yan, “Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Rolling Bearings using an Enhanced Particle Filter,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 64, No. 10, pp. 2696-2707, October 2015
        20. L. Ren, J. Cui, Y. Q. Sun, and X. J. Cheng, “Multi-Bearing Remaining Useful Life Collaborative Prediction: A Deep Learning Approach,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 43, pp. 248-256, April 2017
        21. R. Pascanu, T. Mikolov, and Y. Bengio, “On the Difficulty of Training Recurrent Neural Networks,” in Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, No. part 3, pp. 1310-1318, June 2013
        22. Y. Bengio, P. Simard, and P. Frasconi, “Learning Long-Term Dependencies with Gradient Descent Is Difficult,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 157-166, March 1994
        23. “National Aeronautics and Space Administration,” (http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/c/3/, accessed November 13, 2018)
        24. N. Chalabi, M. Dahane, B. Beldjilali, and A. Neki, “Optimization of Preventive Maintenance Grouping Strategy for Multi-Component Series Systems: Particle Swarm Based Approach,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 102, pp. 440-451, December 2016
        25. H. C. Vu, P. Do, and A. Barros, “A Stationary Grouping Maintenance Strategy using Mean Residual Life and the Birnbaum Importance Measure for Complex Structures,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 217-234, March 2016

         

         

        Please note : You will need Adobe Acrobat viewer to view the full articles.Get Free Adobe Reader

         
        This site uses encryption for transmitting your passwords. ratmilwebsolutions.com