Int J Performability Eng ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (12): 2927-2940.doi: 10.23940/ijpe.18.12.p3.29272940
Previous Articles Next Articles
Risu Na, Haifeng Zhai(), and Haitang Cen
Revised on
;
Accepted on
Contact:
Zhai Haifeng
E-mail:nrs3000@163.com
Risu Na, Haifeng Zhai, and Haitang Cen. Layer Design and Fluid-Solid Coupling Analysis of the Thermoplastic Composite Wind Turbine Blade [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2018, 14(12): 2927-2940.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
Performance parameters of blade materials"
Material | Elastic modulus | Shear modulus | Poisson ratio | Density |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Gpa | Gpa | - | kg/m3 |
A | E1=72.45 | G12=2.21 | v21=0.29 | 1440 |
E2=7.42 | G13=2.21 | v31=0.29 | ||
E3=7.42 | G23=2.09 | v23=0.28 | ||
B | E1=22.83 | G12=12.80 | v21=0.62 | 1513 |
E2=20.30 | G13=12.80 | v31=0.62 | ||
E3=18.30 | G23=11.32 | v23=0.51 | ||
C | E1=55.96 | G12=18.68 | v21=0.41 | 1513 |
E2=31.48 | G13=17.29 | v31=0.41 | ||
E3=23.95 | G23=16.54 | v23=0.35 | ||
E | 3.44 | 1.38 | 0.3 | 1235 |
F | 3.50 | 1.40 | 0.3 | 1100 |
G | 0.26 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 200 |
Table 3
Complete layer design scheme of blade"
r/R | Blade root | Leading edge | Leading edge aerofoilsection | Spar cap | Web | Trailing edge aerofoil section | Trailing edge |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.000 | 1E+2B+48C+2D+2F | - | - | - | - | - | - |
0.025 | 1E+2B+28C+2D+2F | - | - | - | - | - | - |
0.050 | 1E+2B+18C+2D+2F | - | - | - | - | - | - |
0.075 | 1E+2B+4C+6A+2F | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+2B+1C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+4C+3A+2F | 6B+G | 1E+2B+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2F |
0.115 | - | 1E+2B+2A+2F | 1E+2B+1C+2A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+11A+2F | 6B+G | 1E+2B+1C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1A+2F |
0.155 | - | 1E+2B+2C+1A+2F | 1E+2B+1C+2A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+21A+2F | 6B+G | 1E+2B+1C+2A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+1A+2F |
0.200 | - | 1E+2B+2C+6A+2F | 1E+2B+2C+2A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+31A+2F | 8B+G | 1E+2B+2C+2A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+9A |
0.240 | - | 1E+2B+2C+6A+2F | 1E+2B+2C+6A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+36A+2F | 8B+G | 1E+2B+2C+6A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+9A |
0.280 | - | 1E+2B+2C+6A+2F | 1E+2B+2C+6A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+31A+2F | 8B+G | 1E+2B+2C+6A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+9A |
0.320 | - | 1E+2B+2C+1A+2F | 1E+2B+2C+5A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+26A+2F | 8B+G | 1E+2B+2C+5A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+4A |
0.360 | - | 1E+2B+2C+1A+2F | 1E+2B+2C+4A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+21A+2F | 6B+G | 1E+2B+2C+4A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+4A |
0.400 | - | 1E+2B+2C+1A+2F | 1E+2B+2C+2A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+16A+2F | 6B+G | 1E+2B+2C+3A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+4A |
0.440 | - | 1E+2B+1A+2F | 1E+2B+2C+2A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+16A+2F | 6B+G | 1E+2B+2C+2A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+2A |
0.480 | - | 1E+2B+1A+2F | 1E+2B+2C+2A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+16A+2F | 6B+G | 1E+2B+2C+2A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+2A |
0.520 | - | 1E+2B+1A+2F | 1E+2B+2C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+13A+2F | 6B+G | 1E+2B+2C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+2A |
0.560 | - | 1E+2B+1A+2F | 1E+2B+2C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+13A+2F | 6B+G | 1E+2B+2C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+2A |
0.600 | - | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+2B+2C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+13A+2F | 6B+G | 1E+2B+2C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+1A |
0.640 | - | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+2B+2C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+13A+2F | 6B+G | 1E+2B+2C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+1A |
0.680 | - | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+2B+1C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+11A+2F | 4B+G | 1E+2B+1C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+1A |
0.720 | - | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+2B+1C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+6A+2F | 4B+G | 1E+2B+1C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+1A |
0.760 | - | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+2B+1C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+6A+2F | 4B+G | 1E+2B+1C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1C+1A |
0.800 | - | 1E+1B+1A+2F | 1E+2B+1C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+3A+2F | 4B+G | 1E+2B+1C+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1A |
0.840 | - | 1E+1B+1A+2F | 1E+2B+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+2C+1A+2F | 4B+G | 1E+2B+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1A |
0.860 | - | 1E+1B+1A+2F | 1E+2B+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1A+2F | 2B+G | 1E+2B+1A+G+2F | 1E+2B+1A |
0.920 | - | 1E+1B+1A+2F | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+3A+2F | 2B+G | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+2B+1A |
0.960 | - | 1E+1B+2F | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+3A+2F | 2B+G | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+2B |
1.000 | - | 1E+1B+2F | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+1A+2F | 2B+G | 1E+2B+2F | 1E+2B |
Table 5
Error comparison between two loading methods with the force and torque results in the root of GH blade"
Loading mode | FXB/kN | FYB/kN | FZB/kN | MXB/(N·m) | MYB/(N·m) | MZB/(N·m) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Error | 4.04% | -1.54% | 0.29% | 2.07% | -2.54% | -0.82% |
MPC | 1250.71 | -144.34 | 1580.83 | 2.42×106 | 3.15×105 | 6.11×103 |
GHBlade | 1200.21 | -146.56 | 1576.30 | 2.37×106 | 3.23×105 | 6.16×103 |
Distribution force | 1210.43 | -147.29 | 1578.10 | 2.40×106 | 3.31×105 | 6.15×103 |
Error | 0.84% | 0.50% | 0.11% | 1.25% | 2.42% | -0.16% |
[1] | K. Larsen , “Recycling Wind Turbine Blades,” Renewable Energy Focus,Vol. 9, No. 7, pp. 70-73, 2009 |
[2] |
S. T. Bashir, L. Yang, J. J. Liggat , “Kinetics of Dissolution of Glass Fibre in Hot Alkaline Solution,” Journal of Materials Science,Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 1710-1722, 2018
doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1627-z |
[3] |
K. T. Ramirez, D. A. Turcotte, S. Pike , “Unsustainable Wind Turbine Blade Disposal Practices in the United States,” New Solutions A Journal of Environmental & Occupational Health Policy Ns, Vol. 26, No. 4,pp. 582-588, 2017
doi: 10.1177/1048291116676098 pmid: 27794074 |
[4] | C. L. Li, J. H. Wang, Z. M. Xue , “Application and Development of Materials of Large-Scale Wind Turbine Blades,” Fiber Reinforced Plastics, No. 4, pp. 49-52, 2008 |
[5] | W. Y. Meng, P. W. Sun, L. T. Zhang , “Research and Application of Property Equivalence Algorithm for Composite Lamination Plate based on Energy Method,” Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 1505-1510, 2014 |
[6] |
D.O. Yu and O. J. Kwon , “Predicting Wind Turbine Blade Loads and Aeroelastic Response Using a Coupled CFD-CSD Method,” Renewable Energy, Vol. 70, pp. 184-196, 2014
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.033 |
[7] | F. D. Bianchi, H. D. Battista, R. J. Mantz , “The Wind and Wind Turbines,” Springer, Berlin, 2007 |
[8] | D.J. Oehlers and R. Seracino , “Design of FRP and Steel Plated RC Structures: Retrofitting Beams and slabs for Strength,” Stiffness and Ductility, Elsevier, Netherlands, 2004 |
[9] |
L.C. Forcier and S. Joncas , “Development of a Structural Optimization Strategy for the Design of Next Generation Large Thermoplastic Wind Turbine Blades,” Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization,Vol. 45, No. 6, pp. 889-906, 2012
doi: 10.1007/s00158-011-0722-z |
[10] |
A. P. Vassilopoulos, B. D. Manshadi, T. Keller , “Influence of the Constant Life Diagram Equationtion on the Fatigue Life Prediction of Composite Materials,” International Journal of Fatigue,Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 659-669, 2010
doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.008 |
[11] | J. X. Li, Z. M. Xue, J. H. Wang, B. C. Feng , “Development Status and Trend of Large-Scale Wind Turbine Rotor Blade,” Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites, Vol. 4, pp. 49-52, 2008 |
[12] | M. Hansen , “Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines,” Weltbild, Augsburg, 2008 |
[13] | H. Li and T. G. Wang , “FEM Simulation of Distributed Force Function Loading Applied on Wind Turbine Blade,” Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica,Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 485-489, 2013 |
No related articles found! |
|