Int J Performability Eng ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 107-117.doi: 10.23940/ijpe.20.01.p12. 107117
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Hui Liang*(
), Chao Ge, Fei Liang, and Yusheng Sun
Submitted on
September 16, 2019;
Revised on
October 11, 2019;
Accepted on
November 25, 2019
Contact:
Hui Liang
E-mail:hliang@zzuli.edu.cn
Supported by:Hui Liang, Chao Ge, Fei Liang, and Yusheng Sun. VR-based Training Model for Enhancing Fire Evacuee Safety [J]. Int J Performability Eng, 2020, 16(1): 107-117.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Figure 1.
Fire-scene simulation"
Figure 2.
Simulation of flames and smoke"
Figure 3.
Suggestive signs and hints"
Figure 4.
Player acts by following game instruction"
"
| | (1) |
"
| | (2) |
"
| | (3) |
"
| | (4) |
Figure 5.
Toxic relationship between CO and HCN [5]"
Figure 6.
Effects of CO on the human body [5]"
"
| | (5) |
"
| | (6) |
Table 1
Security path"
| Whether a fire room | Safety factor | Danger Level | Traffic condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| True | 0 | Danger | Impossible |
| False | 1 | Safe | Possible |
"
| | (7) |
"
| | (8) |
|---|---|
| | (9) |
Figure 7.
Floor escape route diagram"
Table 2
Distance of adjacent node"
| Node | A | B1 | B2 | B3 | C1 | C2 | C3 | D1 | D2 | D3 | E1 | E2 | 0 | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0 | 3 | 5 | 4 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
| B1 | 3 | 0 | / | / | 9 | 5 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
| B2 | 5 | / | 0 | / | 4 | 3 | 5 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
| B3 | 4 | / | / | 0 | / | 1 | 7 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / |
| C1 | / | 9 | 4 | / | 0 | / | / | 1.25 | 5 | / | / | / | / | / |
| C2 | / | 5 | 3 | 1 | / | 0 | / | 10 | 4 | 4 | / | / | / | / |
| C3 | / | / | 5 | 7 | / | / | 0 | 5 | 4 | 2 | / | / | / | / |
| D1 | / | / | / | / | 1.25 | 10 | 5 | 0 | / | / | 5 | 2.5 | 6.25 | / |
| D2 | / | / | / | / | 5 | 4 | 4 | / | 0 | / | 7.5 | 9 | / | / |
| D3 | / | / | / | / | / | 6 | 2 | / | / | 0 | 8.75 | 5 | / | / |
| E1 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 5 | 7.5 | 7 | 0 | / | 8.75 | 1.25 |
| E2 | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 2.5 | 9 | 5 | / | 0 | / | 2 |
| O | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 6.25 | / | / | 8.75 | / | 0 | / |
| F | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | / | 1.25 | 2 | / | 0 |
Table 3
Fifth stage"
| Node | F | Distance | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | 1 | 2 | F |
| E2 | 2 | 1 | F |
Table 4
Fourth stage"
| Node | E1 | E2 | Distance | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | 4 + 1 = 5 | 2 + 2 = 4 | 4 | E2 |
| D2 | 6 + 1 = 7 | 9 + 2 = 11 | 7 | E1 |
| D3 | 7 + 1 = 8 | 5 + 2 = 7 | 7 | E2 |
Table 5
Third stage"
| Node | C1 | C2 | C3 | Distance | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 1 + 4 = 5 | 5 + 7 = 12 | / | 5 | D1 |
| C2 | 8 + 4 = 12 | 4 + 7 = 11 | 6 + 7 = 13 | 11 | D2 |
| C3 | 4 + 4 = 8 | 4 + 7 = 11 | 2 + 7 = 9 | 8 | D1 |
Table 6
Second stage"
| Node | C1 | C2 | C3 | Distance | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 9 + 5 = 14 | 5 + 11 = 16 | / | 14 | C1 |
| B2 | 4 + 5 = 9 | 3 + 11 = 14 | 5 + 8 = 13 | 9 | C1 |
| B3 | / | 4 + 7 = 11 | 2 + 7 = 9 | 12 | C2 |
Table 7
Final stage"
| Node | B1 | B2 | B3 | Distance | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 3 + 14 = 17 | 5 + 9 = 14 | 4 + 12 = 16 | 14 | B2 |
Figure 8.
Architecture of game prototype design"
Table 8
Influence of gender, personality, and other factors on scoring"
| Factor | Class | Expectation | Standard deviation | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 53.23 | 31.57 | 1,152.61 |
| Female | 36.54 | 25.32 | 543.51 | |
| Personality | Outgoing | 38.34 | 29.60 | 573.19 |
| Diffidence | 35.70 | 32.43 | 996.47 | |
| Lively, Valiant | 63.12 | 30.60 | 665.32 | |
| Cautious, Insular | 37.54 | 37.66 | 1,097.55 | |
| Acceptance of game | Great master | 73.45 | .099 | 15.63 |
| Ordinary | 39.01 | 29.41 | 849.32 | |
| Green hand | 9.23 | 14.37 | 215.50 |
Figure 9.
Influence of different personalities on score"
Figure 10.
Influence of different personalities on score"
Figure 11.
Relationship between the number of passes and time"
Figure 12.
Participants' scores for the system"
| 1. | H. Liang, J. Chang, S. Deng, C. Chen, R. Tong,J. J. Zhang, “Exploitation of Multiplayer Interaction and Development of Virtual Puppetry Storytelling using Gesture Control and Stereoscopic Devices,” Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2017 |
| 2. | G. Bernardini, M. Dorazio,E. Quagliarini, “Towards a ‘Behavioural Design’ Approach for Seismic Risk Reduction Strategies of Buildings and their Environment,”Safety Science, Vol. 86, pp. 273-294, 2016 |
| 3. | J. Bertram, J. Moskaliuk,U. Cress, “Virtual Training: Making Reality Work?”Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 43, pp. 284-292, 2015 |
| 4. | K. Bhagat, W. K. Liou,C. Y. Chang, “A Cost-Effective Interactive 3D Virtual Reality System Applied To Military Live Firing Training,”Virtual Reality, Vol. 20, pp. 127-140, 2016 |
| 5. | N. Chen and W. Kong, “Research on Optimal Escape and Rescue Routes of Mine Fire,” Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 36, No. 11, pp. 40-42, 2010 |
| 6. | L. Chittaro and F. Buttussi, “Present Knowledge, Retention of an Immersive Serious Game vs. a Traditional Education Method,” Aviation Safety Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 529-538 |
| 7. | C. L. Foronda, K. Shubeck, S. M. Swoboda, K. W. Hudson, C. Budhathoki, N. Sullivan, et al., “Impact of Virtual Simulation to Teach Concepts of Disaster Triage,”Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Vol. 12, pp. 137-144, 2016 |
| 8. | L. B. Grant, “Living with Earthquakes in California: A Survivor's Guide,” Eos Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, Vol. 82, No. 49, pp. 611, 2001 |
| 9. | B. Y.Lammiter and U. Vandsburger, “The Transport of High Concentrations of Carbo Monoxide to Locations Remote from the Burning Compartment, Building and Fire Research Laboratory,” 1997 |
| 10. | S. M. V.Gwynne, et al., “Important Egress Drills: Preparation and Assessment of Evacuee Performance,”The Fire and Electronic Materials, 2017 |
| 11. | S. M. V.Gwynne, K. E. Boyce, E. D. Kuligowski, D. Nilsson, A. Robbins, R. Lovreglio, et al., “Enhancing Egress Drills: Preparation and Assessment of Evacuee Performance,”The Fire and Electronic Materials, 2017 |
| 12. | M. Ramirez, K. Kubicek, C. Peek-Asa,M. Wong, “Accountability and Accountability Assessment of Emergency Drill Performance at Schools,” Family and Community The Health, Vol. 32, No. 2 |
| 13. | C. Cervellera, M. Gaggero, D. Maccio D, et al., “Lattice Point Sets for State Sampling in Approximate Dynamic Programming,”Optimal Control Applications and Methods, Vol. 38, pp. 1193-1207, 2017 |
| 14. | W. Gao, Y. Jiang, Z. Jiang, et al., “Output Feedback Adaptive Optimal Control of Interconnected Systems based on Robust Adaptive Dynamic Programming,”Automatica, Vol. 72, pp. 37-45, 2017 |
| 15. | T. Y. Chun, J. Y. Lee, J. B. Park, et al., “Integral Temporal Difference Learning for Continuous Time Linear Quadratic Regulations,” International Journal of Control Automation and Systems, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2017 |
| 16. | K. Desmet, D. K. Nagy, E. Rossihansberg, et al., “The Geography of Development: Evaluating Migration Restrictions and Coastal Urban Planning,”National Bureau of Economic Research, 2015 |
| 17 | 17.M. J. Lawes, J. J. Midgley, P. J. Clarke, et al., “Costs and Benefits of Relative Bark Thickness in Relation to Fire Damage: A Savanna/Forest Contrast,” Journal of Ecology, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp. 517-524, 2013[ |
|
||
