1. Verma H., Alavi H.S., andLalanne, D. Studying Space Use: Bringing HCI Tools to Architectural Projects. In Proceedings of the2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3856-3866, 2017. 2. Sinha K.K., Mathur M., andSharma, A. Assessment of Bedroom Utility: Fuzzy Logic Based Approach. In2022 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Speech Technology (AIST), IEEE, pp. 1-6, 2022. 3. K.K. Sinha, M. Mathur,A. Sharma.AI based usability prediction for 3 BHK apartments. In Proceeding of the Springer 8th International Conference on ICT Sustainable Development (ICT4SD), in press. 4. Amireh O., Ryalat M. and Alaqtum T., Narrative Architectural Fiction in Mentally Built Environments. PARAMETRICISM VS. MATERIALISM, pp. 283. 5. Hamdy Mahmoud, H.T. Interior Architectural Elements that Affect Human Psychology and Behavior, 2017. 6. Gosling, S.D., Gifford, R.O.B.E.R.T., and Mccuan, L. Environmental Perception and Interior Design. Body Behav. Space, vol. 242, pp. 278-290, 2014. 7. Edman K.W.The Concept of Value in Design Practice-An Interview Study. In Second Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation, ServDes2010, pp. 1-14, 2010. 8. Karimi R., Avazpour B., andSepasgozar S.M.Effective Factors on Desirability of Private Open Spaces: A Case Study of Kuye Nasr Residential Buildings, Tehran. Smart Cities and Construction Technologies, pp. 95, 2020. 9. Brkanić I.Housing Quality Assessment Criteria. Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS, vol. 8, no. 14, pp. 37-47, 2017. 10. Kwon, H.A.,Kim, S.Characteristics of Residential Space in Response to Changed Lifestyles: Focusing on the Characteristics of Residents and the Relationship between Individual and Family. sustainability, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2006, 2019. 11. Sima L.A Study on Small Apartment Design in China: Evaluation on the Impressions of and Preferences for the Floor Plans. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 307-314, 2015. 12. Živković, M. and Jovanović, G.A Method for Evaluating the Degree of Housing Unit Flexibility in Multi-Family Housing. Facta universitatis-series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17-32, 2012. 13. R. Matias, Use-value vs Exchange value, https://urbz.net/articles/use-value-vs-exchange-value, accessed on June 10, 2021. 14. Bittencourt M.C., do Valle Pereira, V.L.D., and Júnior, W.P. The Usability of Architectural Spaces: Objective and Subjective Qualities of Built Environment as Multidisciplinary Construction. Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 3, pp. 6429-6436, 2015. 15. Altaş, N.E. and Özsoy, A.Spatial Adaptability and Flexibility as Parameters of User Satisfaction for Quality Housing. Building and environment, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 315-323, 1998. 16. Gzsoy A.,Esin Altag, N., Ok, V., and Pulat Giikmen, G., Quality Assessment in Housing based on Behavioral Data. Research Report sponsored by Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, 1995. 17. Mitra D., Steinmetz N., Chu Y., andCetin K. Activity Profiles of Occupants in Residential Buildings using the American Time Use Survey Data. In Construction Research Congress2020, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1067-1076, 2020. 18. Islam Z.H.,Architects’ Endeavour and User-response: A Post Occupancy Evaluation of Apartments in Dhaka. 19. De Paris, S.R. and Lopes, C.N.L. Housing Flexibility Problem: Review of Recent Limitations and Solutions. Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 80-91, 2018. 20. Tucker, A. in Search of Home. Journal of applied philosophy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 181-187, 1994. 21. Cutieru, Pioneers: 6 practices bringing AI into Architecture, https://www.archdaily.com/936999/pioneers-6-practices-bringing-ai-into-architecture, accessed on February 26, 2021. 22. R. Verganti, L. Vendraminelli,M. Iansiti.Design in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 20-091, 2020. 23. Frías C., Peña J.M., Sánchez É., andAlmeida L.BIMBOT-(Artificial Intelligence Applied to BIM Design). EGE Revista de Expresión Gráfica en la Edificación, no. 12, pp. 45-60, 2020. 24. Magarò, A. and Baratta, A.F.Machine Learning and Safe and Inclusive Architecture for Fragile Users. AGATHÓN| International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, vol. 5, pp. 109-116, 2019. 25. As I., Pal S., andBasu P.Artificial Intelligence in Architecture: Generating Conceptual Design via Deep Learning. International Journal of Architectural Computing, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 306-327, 2018. 26. Reffat R.Utilization of Artificial Intelligence Concepts and Techniques for Enriching the Quality of Architectural Design Artifacts. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference in Information Systems, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2002. 27. M. Marsh and M. Sayre, Social Data Brings New Life to AI for Architecture, https://www.workdesign.com/2020/03/social-data-brings-newlife-to-ai-for-architecture, accessed on February 16, 2021) 28. Wiberg M.Interaction Design Meets Architectural Thinking. interactions, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 60-63, 2015. 29. Wang, C.L. and Yoon, K.S.Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics & Mathematical Systems, vol. 404, no. 4, pp. 287-288, 1981. |